Did we decide against LAZY? Seems we have a number of people concerned about vacuum downtime, and I can see this as a win for them. If they don't specify LAZY, the code is not run. > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > should be easily testable though, no? > > What makes you think that? > > > worst case, we pull it out afterwards ... > > No, worst case is that we release a seriously broken 7.1, and don't > find out till afterwards. > > There are plenty of new features on my to-do list, if beta no longer > means anything... > > regards, tom lane > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Andrew Snow
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Alfred Perlstein