> > I'd vote for the second choice. I do not think we should be adding new > > features now. Also, I don't know about you, but I have enough bug fix, > > testing, and documentation work to keep me busy till January even > > without any new features... > > It'd be really naughty to add it to the beta at this stage. Would it be > possible to add it to the 7.1 package with some kind of compile-time option? > So that those of us who do want to use it, can. That usually adds confusion. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes ... Andrew Snow
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Alfred Perlstein