On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > should be easily testable though, no? > > What makes you think that? Alfred could volunteer to move to v7.1? *grin*
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Andrew Snow
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Alfred Perlstein