On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Basically Vadim left it up to me to campaign for acceptance of this > > > work and he said he wouldn't have a problem bringing it in as long > > > as it was ok with the rest of the development team. > > > So can we get a go-ahead on this? :) > > > > If Vadim isn't sufficiently confident of it to commit it on his own > > authority, I'm inclined to leave it out of 7.1. My concern is mostly > > schedule. We are well into beta cycle now and this seems like way too > > critical (not to say high-risk) a feature to be adding after start of > > beta. > > I was wondering if Vadim was hesitant because he had done this under > contract. Vadim, are you concerned about reliability or are there other > issues? Irrelevant .. we are post-beta release, and this doesn't fix a bug, so it doesn't go in ...
- [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes avai... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker