Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Basically Vadim left it up to me to campaign for acceptance of this > work and he said he wouldn't have a problem bringing it in as long > as it was ok with the rest of the development team. > So can we get a go-ahead on this? :) If Vadim isn't sufficiently confident of it to commit it on his own authority, I'm inclined to leave it out of 7.1. My concern is mostly schedule. We are well into beta cycle now and this seems like way too critical (not to say high-risk) a feature to be adding after start of beta. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes avai... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane