On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Basically Vadim left it up to me to campaign for acceptance of this > > work and he said he wouldn't have a problem bringing it in as long > > as it was ok with the rest of the development team. > > So can we get a go-ahead on this? :) > > If Vadim isn't sufficiently confident of it to commit it on his own > authority, I'm inclined to leave it out of 7.1. My concern is mostly > schedule. We are well into beta cycle now and this seems like way too > critical (not to say high-risk) a feature to be adding after start of > beta. As this is post-beta release, and this isn't a bug fix, I concur with this ... its something we can easily put up on the web site as a patch to v7.1, but would prefer this not going mainstream until *after* release ...
- [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes avai... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Alfred Perlstein
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane