Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My concern is the robustness of rel cache. > It seems pretty dangerous to discard system relation > descriptors used for cache mechanism especially in > case of error recovery. > It also seems pretty dangerous to recontruct relation > descriptors especially in case of error recovery. Why? We are able to construct all the non-nailed relcache entries from scratch during backend startup. That seems a sufficient proof that we can reconstruct any or all of them on demand. Until the changes I made today, there was a flaw in that logic, namely that the specific order that relcache entries are built in during startup might be somehow magic, ie, building them in another order might cause a recursive syscache call. But now, that doesn't matter. regards, tom lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modified w... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Hiroshi Inoue
- ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HACKER... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HA... Tom Lane
- Re: ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HA... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Recursive use of syscac... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recursive use of sy... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Hiroshi Inoue
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Alex Pilosov
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in u... Hiroshi Inoue