I wrote: > On top of that, we have the issue I was concerned about that there is > no mechanism for clearing the cache-busy flags during xact abort. Hmm, brain cells must be fading fast. On looking into the code I find that there *is* such a mechanism --- installed by yours truly, only three months ago. Still, I think getting rid of the test altogether is a better answer. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in u... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while ... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modified w... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Hiroshi Inoue
- ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HACKER... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HA... Tom Lane
- Re: ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HA... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Recursive use of syscac... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recursive use of sy... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Hiroshi Inoue
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Alex Pilosov
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in u... Hiroshi Inoue