> Rather than trying to fix this stuff, I propose that we simply remove > the test for recursive use of a syscache. AFAICS it will never catch > any real bugs in production. It might catch bugs in development (ie, > someone messes up the startup sequence in a way that causes a truly > circular cache lookup) but I think a stack overflow crash is a > perfectly OK result then. Agreed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in u... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while ... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modified w... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Hiroshi Inoue
- ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HACKER... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HA... Tom Lane
- Re: ResetSystemCaches(was Re: [HA... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Recursive use of syscac... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use of sy... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recursive use o... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Hiroshi Inoue
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modifi... Alex Pilosov
- RE: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] relation ### modified while in use Vadim Mikheev