On 2021-Jun-12, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I was thinking maybe we could mark all these replication protocol > >> violation errors non-translatable. While we don't want to crash on a > >> protocol violation, it shouldn't really be a user-facing case either. > > > I don't see any problem with that as these are not directly related to > > any user operation. So, +1 for making these non-translatable. > > Done that way.
Good call, thanks. Not only it's not very useful to translate such messages, but it's also quite a burden because some of them are difficult to translate. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile "Tiene valor aquel que admite que es un cobarde" (Fernandel)
