Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I was thinking maybe we could mark all these replication protocol
>> violation errors non-translatable. While we don't want to crash on a
>> protocol violation, it shouldn't really be a user-facing case either.
> I don't see any problem with that as these are not directly related to
> any user operation. So, +1 for making these non-translatable.
Done that way. On re-reading the code, there were a bunch more
Asserts that could be triggered by bad input data, so the committed
patch has rather more corrections than I posted before.
regards, tom lane
