On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:17 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2021-Mar-09, James Coleman wrote: > > > Yes, I think they both agreed on the "DETAIL: Hot standby mode is > > disabled." message, but that alternative meant not needing to add any > > new signals and pm states, correct? > > Ah, I see! I was thinking that you still needed the state and signal in > order to print the correct message in hot-standby mode, but that's > (obviously!) wrong. So you're right that no signal/state are needed.
Cool. And yes, I'm planning to update the patch soon. Thanks, James
