On 2021-Mar-09, James Coleman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 8:47 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > On 2021-Mar-07, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Great, so we're agreed on the messages to emit. James, are you updating > > your patch, considering Fujii's note about the new signal and pmstate > > that need to be added? > > Perhaps I'm missing something, but I was under the impression the > "prefer the former message" meant we were not adding a new signal and > pmstate?
Eh, I read that differently. I was proposing two options for the DETAIL line in that case: > DETAIL: Hot standby mode is disabled. > or maybe > DETAIL: Consistent state has not yet been reached, and hot standby mode is > disabled. and both Fujii and Magnus said they prefer the first option over the second option. I don't read any of them as saying that they would like to do something else (including not doing anything). Maybe I misinterpreted them? -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile