On 2021-Mar-09, James Coleman wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 8:47 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-Mar-07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> 
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Great, so we're agreed on the messages to emit.  James, are you updating
> > your patch, considering Fujii's note about the new signal and pmstate
> > that need to be added?
> 
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I was under the impression the
> "prefer the former message" meant we were not adding a new signal and
> pmstate?

Eh, I read that differently.  I was proposing two options for the DETAIL
line in that case:

>  DETAIL:  Hot standby mode is disabled.
>  or maybe
>  DETAIL:  Consistent state has not yet been reached, and hot standby mode is 
> disabled.

and both Fujii and Magnus said they prefer the first option over the
second option.  I don't read any of them as saying that they would like
to do something else (including not doing anything).

Maybe I misinterpreted them?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile


Reply via email to