On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:51 PM Fujii Masao < > masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> > > wrote: > >> Also I think this note should be in the different paragraph from the > >> paragraph > >> of "The pg_settings view cannot be inserted into or deleted from...." > >> because > >> they are different topics. Thought? > > > Agreed on both points. In a separate paragraph, I think it's awkward to > > start two consecutive sentences with "The pg_settings view". If we put it > > in the previous paragraph we could phrase it like this: > > > "See Section 20.1 for more information about the various ways to change > > these parameters. Customized options are not displayed until the > > extension module that defines them has been loaded. > > That just moves the subject-inconsistency to a different para :-( > I think this item should be its own new para. > > As for the repetitiveness, we could just say "This view ...", in one or > even both paras. > Okay, along those lines here's a patch using "this view" in a new paragraph for simplicity. -- John Naylor EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
v3-doc-pg-settings-no-custom.patch
Description: Binary data
