On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 09:00:15PM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote: > Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > > > If the comment tells that t_hoff can be computed (i.e. it's no necessary to > > include it in the structure), I think the comment should tell why it's yet > > included. Maybe something about "historical reasons"? Perhaps we can say > > that > > the storage used to be free due to padding, and that it's no longer so, but > > it's still "cheap", so it's not worth to teach the REDO functions to compute > > the value. > > I've received some more replies to your email as soon as I had replied. I > don't insist on my proposal, just go ahead with your simpler changes.
Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
