Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Updated patch.

FWIW, I concur with the idea of just dropping that sentence altogether.
It's not likely that getting rid of that field is a line of development
that will ever be pursued; if anyone does get concerned about cutting
WAL size, there's a lot of more-valuable directions to go in.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to