On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:30 PM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > So, in our world, wouldn't this translate to 'make cfbot complain'?
This seems like it would be useful, but we'd have to figure out what to do about typedefs.list. If the patch is indented with the current one (which is auto-generated by the entire build farm, remember) it's likely to mess up a patch that's otherwise properly formatted. We'd either need to insist that people include updates to typedefs.list in the patch, or else have the cfbot take a stab at doing those updates itself. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company