On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:14 PM Tom Lane wrote: > > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > ... Another advantage of master-only is a guarantee against > > disrupting time-critical patches. (It would be ugly to push back branches > > and > > sort out the master push later, but it doesn't obstruct the mission.) > > Hm, doesn't it? I had the idea that "git push" is atomic --- either all > the per-branch commits succeed, or they all fail. I might be wrong.
As of Git 2.28, atomic pushes are not turned on by default. That means "git push my-remote foo bar" _can_ result in partial success. I'm that paranoid who does "git push --atomic my-remote foo bar fizz". Cheers, Jesse
