> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:55 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Poking around in the archives, it seems like the only previous formal
> proposal to add -Wimplicit-fallthrough was in the context of a much
> more aggressive proposal to make a lot of non-Wall warnings into
> errors [1], which people did not like.
That was from me.
> The only more-restrictive alternative, short of disabling
> the comments altogether, is
>
> * -Wimplicit-fallthrough=4 case sensitively matches one of the
> following regular expressions:
>
> *<"-fallthrough">
> *<"@fallthrough@">
> *<"lint -fallthrough[ \t]*">
> *<"[ \t]*FALLTHR(OUGH|U)[ \t]*">
>
> Thoughts?
Naturally, I'm +1 for this.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
