On 2020/02/07 17:28, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:02 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
BTW, commit 147e3722f7 causing the issue changed currtid_byreloid()
and currtid_byrelname() so that they also call table_beginscan().
I'm not sure what those functions are, but probably we should fix them
so that table_beginscan_tid() is called instead. Thought?
+1, sorry, I overlooked it.
Both functions are used to check whether a valid tid or not with a
relation name (or oid),
and both perform a tid scan internally.
So, these functions should call table_beginscan_tid().
Perhaps unnecessary, I will attach a patch.
Pushed! Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters
