Hi, On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:02 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > BTW, commit 147e3722f7 causing the issue changed currtid_byreloid() > and currtid_byrelname() so that they also call table_beginscan(). > I'm not sure what those functions are, but probably we should fix them > so that table_beginscan_tid() is called instead. Thought? +1, sorry, I overlooked it.
Both functions are used to check whether a valid tid or not with a relation name (or oid), and both perform a tid scan internally. So, these functions should call table_beginscan_tid(). Perhaps unnecessary, I will attach a patch. Best regards, -- Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com
fix_tidscan_issues_v6.patch
Description: Binary data
