Hi, On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:48 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I think it'd be good if we could guard against b) via an isolation > test. It's more painful to do that for a), due to the unreliability of > stats at the moment (we have some tests, but they take a long time). Thanks for your advise, and agreed.
I added a new (but minimal) isolation test for the case of tid scan. (v12 and HEAD will be failed this test. v11 and HEAD with my patch will be passed) Best regards, -- Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuhito _at_ gmail.com
fix_tidscan_issues_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
