On 20/01/2020 08:44, Dean Rasheed wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions? >> Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42" >> is an int not a smallint. >> > I see this has been marked RFC. I'll take it,
Thanks! > and barring objections, > I'll start by ripping out the smallint code. No strong objection. -- Vik Fearing