On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions? > > Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42" > is an int not a smallint. >
I see this has been marked RFC. I'll take it, and barring objections, I'll start by ripping out the smallint code. Regards, Dean
