On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:12:04PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:13 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> "postgres_fdw foreign tables" sounds weird to me. Could "foreign >> tables using postgres_fdw" be a better wording? I am wondering as >> well if we should not split this information into two parts: one for >> the actual error message which only mentions foreign tables, and a >> second one with a hint to mention that postgres_fdw has been used. > > We use "postgres_fdw foreign tables" or "postgres_fdw tables" in > release notes, so I thought it was OK to use that in error messages as > well. But actually, these wordings are not suitable for error > messages?
It is true that the docs of postgres_fdw use that and that it is used in some comments. Still, I found this wording a bit weird.. If you think that what you have is better, I am also fine to let you have the final word, so please feel to ignore me :) -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
