On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 03:13:36PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-Apr-07, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > ne 7. 4. 2019 v 20:27 odesÃlatel Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > > napsal: > > > > In order for this to display sanely, I added the "Parent name" column if > > > either the "n" flag is shown or a pattern is given (previously it only > > > appeared in the former case). > > > > I am thinking about it and original behave and this new behave should be > > expected (and unexpected too). We can go this way - I have not > > counter-arguments, but yes, it is more consistent with some other commands, > > pattern disables some other constraints. > > > > It should be documented - Using any pattern in this case forces 'n' flag. > > Added to the docs, and pushed.
Thanks for helping it across the finish line. I see you changed from relname to oid::regclass, which is good, thanks. Then, it's unnecessary to join against pg_class again (and I don't know why it was a left join) ? Also docs are wrong re: indices. Justin
