On 2019/03/07 22:54, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:35 AM Etsuro Fujita > <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Thanks for the patch! >> >> The patch looks good to me, but one thing I'm wondering is: as suggested >> by David, it would be better to rephrase this mention in the UPDATE >> reference page, in a single commit: >> >> "Currently, rows cannot be moved from a partition that is a foreign >> table to some other partition, but they can be moved into a foreign >> table if the foreign data wrapper supports it." >> >> I don't think it needs to be completely rephrased; it's enough for me to >> rewrite it to something like this: >> >> "Currently, rows cannot be moved from a foreign-table partition to some >> other partition, but they can be moved into a foreign-table partition if >> the foreign data wrapper supports tuple routing." > > I prefer David's wording.
IIUC, David's suggestion [1] is to change the existing wording, which he found hard to parse, to something like Fujita-san is suggesting. Thanks, Amit [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f-SauQJftjcaQ7C_tzHh_be5C8shT-E9qYnVp%2Bjh4-Fww%40mail.gmail.com