(2019/03/06 15:34), Amit Langote wrote:
On 2019/03/06 15:10, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
@@ -3376,6 +3376,13 @@ ALTER TABLE measurement ATTACH PARTITION
measurement_y2008m02
        </para>
       </listitem>

+<listitem>
+<para>
+<command>UPDATE</command>  row movement is not supported in the cases
+       where the old row is contained in a foreign table partition.
+</para>
+</listitem>

ISTM that it's also a limitation that rows can be moved from a local
partition to a foreign partition *if the FDW support tuple routing*, so I
would vote for mentioning that as well here.

Thanks for checking.

I have updated the patch to include a line about this in the same
paragraph, because maybe we don't need to make a new<listitem>  for it.

Thanks for the patch!

The patch looks good to me, but one thing I'm wondering is: as suggested by David, it would be better to rephrase this mention in the UPDATE reference page, in a single commit:

"Currently, rows cannot be moved from a partition that is a foreign table to some other partition, but they can be moved into a foreign table if the foreign data wrapper supports it."

I don't think it needs to be completely rephrased; it's enough for me to rewrite it to something like this:

"Currently, rows cannot be moved from a foreign-table partition to some other partition, but they can be moved into a foreign-table partition if the foreign data wrapper supports tuple routing."

And to make maintenance work easy, I think it might be better to just put this on the limitations section of 5.10. Table Partitioning. What do you think about that?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


Reply via email to