This is a noise from a Japanese having poor English skill.. At Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:01:36 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote in <20181128010136.gu1...@paquier.xyz> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:51:03PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > That isn't at all what I got from that. > > > > A rewrite of this really should avoid talking about removing the hole as > > if it's 'compression' because, first of all, it isn't, and second, now > > that we have *actual* compression happening, it's terribly confusing to > > talk about removing the hole using that terminology. > > You may want to be careful about other comments in xloginsert.c or such > then. Removing a page hole is mentioned in a couple of places as a form > of compression if I recall correctly.
org> When wal_compression is enabled, a full page image which "hole" was org> removed is additionally compressed using PGLZ compression algorithm. Even though it has an obvious mistake, I could read this as full_page_image is always compressed after removing a hole in it if any. (I'm not sure it makes correct sense, though.) I feel hopelessly that the sentence structure model in my mind is different from that of natives. I need to study harder, but.. Sorry for the noise in advance. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center