Greetings, * Sergei Kornilov (s...@zsrv.org) wrote: > > I would think we'd have the different GUCs and then the check functions > > would only validate that they're valid inputs and then when we get to > > the point where we're starting to do recovery we check and make sure > > we've been given a sane overall configuration- which means that only > > *one* is set, and it matches the recovery target requested. > How about something like attached patch?
I've not been following this very closely, but seems like
recovery_target_string is a bad idea.. Why not just make that
'recovery_target_immediate' and make it a boolean? Having a GUC that's
only got one valid value seems really odd.
> + if (targetSettingsCount > 1)
> + ereport(FATAL,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> + errmsg("can not specify multiple recovery
> targets")));
I think I would have done 'if (targetSettingsCount != 1)' here.
> -# Multiple targets
> -# Last entry has priority (note that an array respects the order of items
> -# not hashes).
You could (and imv should) include a test that throws an expected error
if multiple targets are specified.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
