At 2018-11-26 10:18:52 -0500, sfr...@snowman.net wrote: > > > This came originally to check that recovery.conf handles correctly > > its recovery targets when multiple ones are defined with the last > > one winning […] > > Ugh, no, I don't agree that this property makes sense to keep and > since we're making these changes, I'd argue that it's exactly the > right time to do away with that.
I strongly agree with everything Stephen said here. -- Abhijit
