Hi, On 2018-10-09 17:39:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but: > >> I do not think we should remove timeofday(). It's unrelated to these > >> datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated > >> elsewhere. > > > Ok. I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly > > related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c. Moving > > it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense? > > Sure, if you want to flush nabstime.c completely, just shove it over > there.
I've done that now, together with two commits for removal of timetravel and abstime, reltime, tinterval. Greetings, Andres Freund
