Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but:
>> I do not think we should remove timeofday(). It's unrelated to these
>> datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated
>> elsewhere.
> Ok. I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly
> related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c. Moving
> it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense?
Sure, if you want to flush nabstime.c completely, just shove it over
there.
regards, tom lane
