On 23.06.25 09:04, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 9:09 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
Good point. I would be on board with a \close_prepared then, if
that's the consensus we reach, without touching at \bind_named. We
still have time to decide on the name until the release, just let's
make sure to not do a rename multiple times.
True. That would also allow adding a \close_cursor meta-command
without name ambiguity.
Since the consensus seems to lean toward \close_prepared, I've
prepared the patch to rename the command.
Looks good to me, thanks.
