On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 9:09 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Good point. I would be on board with a \close_prepared then, if > that's the consensus we reach, without touching at \bind_named. We > still have time to decide on the name until the release, just let's > make sure to not do a rename multiple times.
True. That would also allow adding a \close_cursor meta-command without name ambiguity. Since the consensus seems to lean toward \close_prepared, I've prepared the patch to rename the command. I haven't modified the traduction files though, I think they're updated through a different process?
v01-0001-Rename-close-to-close_prepared.patch
Description: Binary data
