On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 09:53:13PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 9:14 AM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> > wrote: >> And this is not something users ever see, so the connection would not be >> obvious. Maybe this should be called something more specific like >> \close_stmt. > > Maybe just \closeprepared ?
I'm OK with a rename if people feel strongly about it and we still have the time to do tweaks like that, but I don't like the suggestions \close_stmt and \closeprepared, because that's inconsistent with the other new meta-commands. What about \close_named to be consistent with \bind_named? We always require a statement name when closing a prepared statement. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
