> On 4 Jun 2025, at 22:15, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> I tend think pg_upgrade should stick to checking things that are necessary > for the upgrade to succeed. It shouldn't start being an interactive portal > to the release notes for aspects that are merely recommendations. Agreed, I was going to support this warning but this comment convinced me otherwise. pg_upgrade is messy as it is without tasking it with more usecases. -- Daniel Gustafsson
