On Fri, 2 May 2025 14:56:56 +0200 Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> On 2025-May-02, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > That depends. If we conclude that tracking this information through > > the parser based on the start and end positions in a query string > > for a set of values is more relevant, then we would be redesigning > > the facility from the ground, so the old approach would not be > > really relevant.. > > I disagree that a revert is warranted for this reason. If you want to > change the implementation later, that's fine, as long as the user > interface doesn't change. > FWIW, i'm +1 on leaving it in pg18. Prepared statements often look a little different in other ways, and there are a bunch of other quirks in how queryid's are calculated too. Didn't there used to be something with CALL being handled as a utility statement making stored procs look different from functions? -- To know the thoughts and deeds that have marked man's progress is to feel the great heart throbs of humanity through the centuries; and if one does not feel in these pulsations a heavenward striving, one must indeed be deaf to the harmonies of life. Helen Keller. Let Us Have Faith. Doubleday, Doran & Company, 1940.
