On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 03:57:16PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: > I think what we should really allow the broader scope of expressions that > are allowed via prepared statements, and this will make this implementation > consistent between prepared vs non-prepared statements. I don't see why > not. In fact, when we are examining the ArrayExpr, I think the only > thing we should > not squash is if we find a Sublink ( i.e. SELECT statement inside the array ).
Likely so. I don't have anything else than Sublink in mind that would be worth a special case.. > I am really leaning towards that we should revert this feature as the > limitation we have now with parameters is a rather large one and I think > we need to go back and address this issue. I am wondering if this would not be the best move to do on HEAD. Let's see where the discussion drives us. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
