On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 02:18:21PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote: > I think we should just block Foreign tables as we do with > partition tables. Attached patch does that.
Unless there's some existing way to specify a FREEZE option in the FDW API (I assume there isn't), I agree with this. > I was also looking at why we block a parent from COPY FREEZE[1], but > the comments do not convince me this is a good idea. I think there > are good cases to allow this considering there is a common use case in > which a single > COPY command can load a large amount of data, making the overhead to check the > partitions worth the value of the FREEZE optimization. I will probably > start a separate thread for this. Commit 5c9a551 and its thread [0] appear to have some additional details about this. [0] https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9BbJ%2BFY3TbdCiap3qXHTFOiwtays9s36-oQkkM9_R5bg%40mail.gmail.com -- nathan
