On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:12:49AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 2025-01-26 Su 9:02 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> This seems to me like the wrong fix. We don't want to create >> "no_such_user" I think, we just want to catch the Windows error message, >> as in this patch.
Back into business now, apologies for the delay. > Ignore this ... I'm clearly insufficiently caffeinated this morning. Despite > the name, this doesn't actually create the role, so the proposed fix would > be fine, I think. Yep. config_sspi_auth() would fill into hba.conf a new HBA entry for all the roles given by --create-role under the --config-auth switch, which is wnat we want here. Will go fix in a bit using Dagfinn's patch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
