Hi, On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:13:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:13:59AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > Having said that, v9-0002 looks good to me (except the > > pgstat_fetch_proc_stat_io > > renaming). > > This routine returns a PgStat_Backend from a pgstats entry of type > PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND, so the name in v9-0001 would not be true once > more types of stats data are attached to this structure.
Fair enough, let's go with the name change done in v9-0002. > The name in > v9-0002 is more consistent long-term. Agree, we may need to add parameters to it but we'll see when the time comes. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com