Hi,

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:13:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:13:59AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Having said that, v9-0002 looks good to me (except the 
> > pgstat_fetch_proc_stat_io
> > renaming).
> 
> This routine returns a PgStat_Backend from a pgstats entry of type
> PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND, so the name in v9-0001 would not be true once
> more types of stats data are attached to this structure.

Fair enough, let's go with the name change done in v9-0002.

> The name in
> v9-0002 is more consistent long-term.

Agree, we may need to add parameters to it but we'll see when the time comes.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to