On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:13:59AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Having said that, v9-0002 looks good to me (except the 
> pgstat_fetch_proc_stat_io
> renaming).

This routine returns a PgStat_Backend from a pgstats entry of type
PGSTAT_KIND_BACKEND, so the name in v9-0001 would not be true once
more types of stats data are attached to this structure.  The name in
v9-0002 is more consistent long-term.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to