On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 04:57:35PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2024-Nov-27, Bruce Momjian wrote: > There would be no default. Running with no option given would raise an > error. The point is: you want to break scripts currently running > --analyze-in-stages so that they can make a choice of which of these two > modes to run. Your proposal (as I understand it) is to remove the > --analyze-in-stages option and add two other options. My proposal is to > keep --analyze-in-stages, but require it to have a specifier of which > mode to run. Both achieve what you want, but I think mine achieves it > in a cleaner way. > > > Uh, do we have parameters that require a boolean option like this? > > I'm not sure what exactly are you asking here.
I can't think of a Postgres option that can take only one of two possible values, and where there is no default value. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means "Am I going to die soon?"
