On 2024-Nov-27, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 09:18:45AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > > Maybe not remove the option, but add a required parameter: > > > --analyze-in-stages=all / missing > > > > > > That way, if the option is missing, the user can adapt the command line > > > according to need. > > > > I like this idea. > > Would there be a default? There would be no default. Running with no option given would raise an error. The point is: you want to break scripts currently running --analyze-in-stages so that they can make a choice of which of these two modes to run. Your proposal (as I understand it) is to remove the --analyze-in-stages option and add two other options. My proposal is to keep --analyze-in-stages, but require it to have a specifier of which mode to run. Both achieve what you want, but I think mine achieves it in a cleaner way. > Uh, do we have parameters that require a boolean option like this? I'm not sure what exactly are you asking here. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La gente vulgar sólo piensa en pasar el tiempo; el que tiene talento, en aprovecharlo"
