On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 11:10 AM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > Rather than depend on figuring out if we are in FIPS_mode in a portable > way, I think the GUC is simpler and sufficient. Why not do that and just > use a better name, e.g. legacy_crypto_enabled or something similar > (bike-shedding welcomed) as in the attached.
While it's definitely simpler, I read the original request as "forbid non-FIPS crypto if the system tells us to", and I don't think this proposal does that. --Jacob
