On 11/19/24 18:12, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:30 PM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
Any other opinions out there?
Why should we accept your patch (which adds a legacy_crypto_enabled
GUC) instead of adopting the approach originally proposed (i.e. use
the OpenSSL version of the functions)?
Because that idea was rejected earlier in the thread by multiple people
other than me?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com