On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:30 PM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > Any other opinions out there?
Why should we accept your patch (which adds a legacy_crypto_enabled GUC) instead of adopting the approach originally proposed (i.e. use the OpenSSL version of the functions)? It seems to me that the two proposals accomplish the same thing, except that one of them also adds a GUC. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
