Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:13:40AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> I just pushed it before seeing your message.
> Fine as well, thanks for picking this up. The buildfarm shows no > failures about this patch. I scraped all the compiler warnings from the buildfarm this morning, and I see no new ones that could be blamed on this change, so I think we're good. bowerbird and hamerkop have some gripes like this: bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition (src/pl/plperl/SPI.c) [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition (src/pl/plperl/Util.c) [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition (src/pl/plperl/plperl.c) [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\hstore_plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\jsonb_plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition (src/pl/plperl/SPI.c) [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition (src/pl/plperl/Util.c) [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition (src/pl/plperl/plperl.c) [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\hstore_plperl.vcxproj] bowerbird | c:\perl64\lib\core\win32.h(218): warning C4005: 'isnan' : macro redefinition [G:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.build\jsonb_plperl.vcxproj] but those were there before too. Not sure if there's anything we can/should try to do about that. regards, tom lane