On 2024/07/03 17:51, hajime.matsun...@nttdata.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions the other day. I have created a patch that incorporates your suggestions.
- <structname>pg_stat_database</structname></link>, in the output of + <structname>pg_stat_database</structname></link> and + <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-io-view"> + <structname>pg_stat_io</structname></link>, in the output of I'm not a native English speaker, but it seems more natural to use a comma instead of "and" before "pg_stat_io." - of block read and write times. + of block read, block write, extend, and fsync times. "block" before "fsync" doesn't seem necessary. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
